Employee Confidentiality Contract Is There A Loophole In This Non Compete Contract?
Is there a loophole in this non compete contract? - employee confidentiality contract
I started a construction company in February this year as Company LLC. Because of the state run Liscensing procedures not in a position to all construction work. Therefore, I am looking for another job during this period. One company I interviewed with me a non-compete and a confidentiality agreement. Parties do not contest "the worker must open or (a company set up or a partner, a member of an LLC or encourage founder of a company) that directly or indirectly involved in entrepreneurial employees, suppliers, customers or employers of the public Turnover empoloyer that compete with the counties within 75 miles of each city, the company will over a period of two years after its completion could.
The rest of the non-competition clause is essentially confirms that the employee does not open an attachment within those limits.
So when I leave later, I have concluded this agreement because my existing business.
|
4 comments:
Yes, that one can consider that this agreement and, as will be the workers and not a partner who would not agree with. Construction is increasingly competitive and do not want to, go to the business opportunities have presented, if you are on their own work.
The answer is yes. Can she be sued? It depends on the state in which the contract was consummated.
Yes, you do not contrracting started your business, so that it could not compete at first glance, prohibiting too. I say "may", because the law varies from state to state, and some may terminate this agreement, and some apply.
Covenants not to compete fairly typical in cases like this. The contracts are held to be valid, but more often the terms "fair". To be honest, I've never heard of a 75 miles. Most have been verified, which is 25 miles.
That is the point. The answer is no - not in "his" In other words, grandfathering, you remain a member of an LLC in the competition and is expressly forbidden. I would almost guarantee a "non compete" clause in the treaty - which says it will not work in a line of a competitor.
Post a Comment